Evil Dead And Other Remakes



Over the course of history we have had to suffer through a multitude of remakes with more on the way. It’s a fact of life that Hollywood wants to capitalize on a name. That’s just how it goes. How many times have seen the same Shakespeare story put on film even though there are other equally good Shakespeare plays that never get made? Why? Because people recognize the names of Hamlet and Romeo & Juliet.

Horror films get hit harder than any other genre because, as horror fans, we get excited that someone is actually releasing a horror movie in theaters. So we go and immediately take to the internet whining and complaining about the latest remake or sequel and how much the studio/director/star ruined your memories. But we go. Studios know this. And what do studios care about most? It’s not the fans. It’s profit. So we get remakes and a sequel a year to the likes of Saw or Paranormal Activity not because we demand it but because they know we’ll watch it. Hell, I have seen every Children Of The Corn and Hellraiser movie, not because I like them but because they were there. That’s what studios count on. Being a genre fan is frustrating and rewarding all at once.

Thirty one years ago an established horror and science fiction filmmaker set out to make his first remake before they became the trendy thing to do in Hollywood. It was one of the only films in that thirty one years to do it right. The movie was The Thing, the filmmaker John Carpenter. He was already moving toward legendary statud thanks to Assault On Precinct 13, Halloween, The Fog and Escape From New York. At the time this seemed like a bad career choice. Why make someone else’s film when you could do something original? But he believed in the movie and felt it had something to say just in the same way that the remake of Invasion Of The Body Snatchers did just a few years earlier. And, like Invasion, he got it right. Since then we have seen nearly all his early masterwork remade. None match what he did with the originals. There have also been a slew of other remakes of famous horror franchises with varying degrees of success – A Nightmare On Elm Street, Friday The 13th, Prom Night, The Hills Have Eyes. The list goes on and grows by the day.
One movie that many prayed for a sequel to and feared a remake of was Evil Dead. This was the movie that launched director Sam Raimi, producer Rob Tapert and star Bruce Campbell. It mixed horror and humor seemlessly as well giving us the most innovative low budget look any horror movie ever could. For those reasons fans, myself included, feared that someone would one day ruin the franchise for us with a remake that insulted us all. I’m glad I was wrong.

The movie started in a very different way than the original. It opened with a woman, bloody and beaten, trying to escape through the woods when something bad happens. Then it cuts to introducing us to the the cast twenty-something pretty people that one expects from a horror movie. But that’s where the movie stops being like your typical “Dead Teenager Movie” (if could steal a phrase from the late, great Roger Ebert). Fede Alvarez had a very clear vision of maing a movie that was not only faithful to the Evil Dead fans but also a balls out horror film that was original and gory fun.

It’s hard to get a remake right because people feel all at once beholden to the original material and have a strong desire to explain things. Take Halloween. Rob Zombie felt that he had to keep the genreal story intact while explaining the childhood of Michael Myers. A Nightmare On Elm Street did a similar thing with giving more back story on Freddy right from the start. This used to be something that wasn’t given till you were three sequels deep in the 80’s. And there’s a reason for that. You need to go in to the first film with the intention of scaring the living shit out of your audience. When you begin to explain the evil away the audience begins to sympathize with the killer. That is like putting the nail in the coffin before the movie is even released. Fede Alvarez knew better. He didn’t go into detail about where the Necronomicon came from or how it gained its power. It was just evil and there were people stupid enough to not heed the warnings and read from it anyway.

The movie got more right than it got wrong. It was smart enough to play with what we expect by keeping us guessing on who would live and who would die. The beats pulled from the previous Evil Dead movies were given a nice twist that kept me guessing. And Jane Levy was truly amazing as Mia. She went from frail to frightened to posessed to all out evil with what seemed to be such effortless ease. For her alone the movie is worth watching. But all the star aligned just right for this film. The cast, the director, the script – everything was spot on. Alvarez took just enough from Raimi’s style to make it feel like an Evil Dead movie while bringing in his own crazy style that fit so well for the movie. I can’t wait to see what he does next.

Also, stay after the credits for a little surprise.

4 1/2 out of 5 stars on this one. It is what horror remakes should aspire to – a movie that doesn’t need to be defined by the fact that it’s a remake.


Where Have All The Genre Heroes Gone?

I was shaped as a young boy watching Halloween, A Nightmare On Elm Street, Friday The 13th, and some of the smaller films like House, Night Of The Creeps, and many others. I wonder sometimes where the people who made these movies ended up.

John Carpenter created one of the most iconic killers in cinema history with nothing more than a shoe string budget and a William Shatner mask. Michael Myers burst onto the scene and changed genre filmmaking forever. Carpenter went on to make some other great and lasting contributions to horror and genre fare. Big Trouble In Little China, The Thing, Escape From New York, and In The Mouth Of Madness. It was after Madness that he started to show signs that he was faltering. Village Of The Damned, although a decent remake, was a sub-par offering from the man who gave us such other great films. Then there was Escape From L.A. and Ghosts Of Mars. That ended it for him. It was like he knew his time was over back in 2001. Masters Of Horror got him back behind the camera for two episodes that were fun but not as good as some others, definitely not Carpenter worthy. But it gave him the itch again. He directed The Ward, a movie I have yet to see and am afraid to watch, much for the same reason I have a small amount of trepidation when I see the names Lucas or Spielberg anymore. I’m afraid his best days are behind him.

Wes Craven gave us The Last House On The Left, The Hills Have Eyes, Shocker, The Serpent And The Rainbow, and Scream. The most he can muster now is My Soul To Take and the soulless Scream 4. What happened? Where’d the spark go?

Steve Miner may not be the big name the previous two are but he made a couple Friday The 13th movies, House, Phantoms, even a Halloween movie. Now he’s doing television. It’s like nobody will hire the guy to make movies anymore. Is that a good thing? I’m not here to judge. But I do love House.

All these directors get old. Their sensibilities change. Spielberg removed shotguns and replaced them with Walkie Talkies in E.T. for God’s sake. I know that as I get older I want to scream everytime a kid turns on Justin Bieber. But if I was a 12 year old girl I would feel differently. That’s part of aging.

My question is – why can’t we see these directors do something else, something that sparks their passions as they are now? Would Clinton Eastwood have done a movie like The Bridges Of Madison County after Pale Rider? no way. But as he got older he realized that he could. Good for him. He figured it out. What these great directorate need to do is figure out their passion again, find it, follow it. It may not be genre but it will be good…because it’s what they want to do. Who’d have thought Kevin Smith could have made a movie with not one Star Wars reference or dart joke. But he did and Red State was amazing. Grow, change, do what you love. Just don’t do what is expected.